7 Key Moments as Clintons Face Contempt Threats
The Clintons push back as House Republicans weigh contempt over subpoenas in the Epstein probe, citing sworn statements and denying wrongdoing.
Washington, D.C. — Former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Wednesday escalated their response to House Republicans, as Oversight Committee Chair James Comer said he plans to pursue contempt of Congress proceedings over what he described as defiance of subpoenas tied to the committee’s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein.
 |
Build a profitable gaming business with 500+ games — book a demo. |
In a statement released by the former president’s office, the Clintons said they are “fighting back with facts and accountability,” accusing Comer of politicizing the inquiry. The statement followed a sharply worded letter sent to Comer a day earlier, in which the Clintons urged supporters to “fight for this country” and characterized the committee’s actions as partisan.
Republicans on the Oversight Committee contend that both Clintons failed to comply with lawful subpoenas requiring their appearance. Comer has said proceedings are scheduled for next week to advance contempt actions, asserting that the former secretary of State “joined her husband in defying a bipartisan, lawful congressional subpoena.”
The Clintons dispute that characterization, saying they have gone “above and beyond” typical requests by submitting sworn, written declarations under penalty of perjury. The declarations—dated January 13—were released publicly and provided to the committee, according to the Clintons.
In the documents, both Clintons deny any personal knowledge of criminal activity by Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell and state they never visited Epstein’s private estate in the U.S. Virgin Islands. They also say they had no involvement—during or after their time in office—in any investigations or prosecutions related to Epstein or Maxwell.
Former President Clinton acknowledged that Epstein “may very well have attended” White House events during his presidency and may have been among the many people photographed at large gatherings, but said he does not recall any specific interaction with Epstein while in office.
Both Clintons also state they cannot recall the circumstances of first meeting Maxwell, noting only that she later became involved with a mutual acquaintance. Each declaration concludes with an affirmation made under penalty of perjury.
The Oversight Committee has not publicly detailed the evidence it believes necessitates in-person testimony beyond the written submissions. Legal experts note that contempt of Congress is a procedural step that can lead to negotiations, enforcement actions, or referral decisions, but does not itself establish wrongdoing.
As the dispute heads toward a possible vote, the clash underscores broader tensions over congressional subpoenas, executive accountability, and the scope of contempt of Congress in high-profile investigations.
Bottom line: The committee is pressing forward, while the Clintons maintain their sworn statements satisfy lawful oversight—setting the stage for a consequential test of congressional authority.
Thank you for reading this content.
If you find it helpful, then checkout : https://plplnews.com/walz-whistleblower-claims-house-whip-investigation
Also check out the latest Peugeot : https://plplnews.com/peugeot-408-review-bold-fastback-crossover-2026
What's Your Reaction?
Like
0
Dislike
0
Love
0
Funny
0
Angry
0
Sad
0
Wow
0
